<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Missouri Family Network</title>
	<atom:link href="http://missourifamilynetwork.net/comments/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://missourifamilynetwork.net</link>
	<description>Defending Traditional Families</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jul 2008 09:58:40 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Help Stop Eminent Domain Abuse by JMB</title>
		<link>http://missourifamilynetwork.net/73/help-stop-eminent-domain-abuse#comment-15165</link>
		<dc:creator>JMB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2008 15:56:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://missourifamilynetwork.net/73/help-stop-eminent-domain-abuse#comment-15165</guid>
		<description>I have found no where in my research of our founding fathers, any suggestion ever taken seriously that would claim that a democracy maintained could ever protect every person against public use, while at the same time I have found no reference in our national constitution or any current state constitutions to that of private takings of citizens over citizens to be a freedom granted by our governments over the words of our people, an acceptable liberty. 
State Constitutions have a very fluid quality in comparison to our peoples Constitution, with an average of approximately 100 amendments to the constitutions of the fifty states, also some states have rewritten their state constitutions up to as many as eleven times. State constitutions tend to be extremely long and complicated.
Please donÃ¢â‚¬â„¢t misunderstand me, I am all for state legislative sovereignty's and states rights, but this issue of We The People to be secure in our homes is at the very foundations of all of our protections and restrictions we the people placed within our National Constitution. Missouri's Constitution already demands upon it's own government, It is the Court's (general or particular) configuring unto constitutions it's own predilection's that violate. 
"The authority of constitutions over governments, and of the sovereignty of the people over constitutions, are truths which are at all times necessary to be kept in mind; and at no time, perhaps, more necessary than at present."-MADISON'S REPORT ON THE VIRGINIA RESOLUTIONS.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have found no where in my research of our founding fathers, any suggestion ever taken seriously that would claim that a democracy maintained could ever protect every person against public use, while at the same time I have found no reference in our national constitution or any current state constitutions to that of private takings of citizens over citizens to be a freedom granted by our governments over the words of our people, an acceptable liberty.<br />
State Constitutions have a very fluid quality in comparison to our peoples Constitution, with an average of approximately 100 amendments to the constitutions of the fifty states, also some states have rewritten their state constitutions up to as many as eleven times. State constitutions tend to be extremely long and complicated.<br />
Please donÃ¢â‚¬â„¢t misunderstand me, I am all for state legislative sovereignty&#8217;s and states rights, but this issue of We The People to be secure in our homes is at the very foundations of all of our protections and restrictions we the people placed within our National Constitution. Missouri&#8217;s Constitution already demands upon it&#8217;s own government, It is the Court&#8217;s (general or particular) configuring unto constitutions it&#8217;s own predilection&#8217;s that violate.<br />
&#8220;The authority of constitutions over governments, and of the sovereignty of the people over constitutions, are truths which are at all times necessary to be kept in mind; and at no time, perhaps, more necessary than at present.&#8221;-MADISON&#8217;S REPORT ON THE VIRGINIA RESOLUTIONS.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Under the Dome: April 23-28, 2007 by Bill</title>
		<link>http://missourifamilynetwork.net/61/under-the-dome-april-23-28-2007#comment-15129</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 07:19:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://missourifamilynetwork.net/61/under-the-dome-april-23-28-2007#comment-15129</guid>
		<description>Check out the Education Bills and the good work Jane has been doing for Missouri.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Check out the Education Bills and the good work Jane has been doing for Missouri.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Under the Dome: February 22, 2008 by DORIS RIDGE</title>
		<link>http://missourifamilynetwork.net/71/under-the-dome-february-22-2008#comment-15104</link>
		<dc:creator>DORIS RIDGE</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2008 04:10:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://missourifamilynetwork.net/71/under-the-dome-february-22-2008#comment-15104</guid>
		<description>DOES THE MISSOURI FAMILY NETWORK SEND OUT EMAIL NEWSLETTERS EACH MONTH?
 IF YOU DO, I'D LIKE TO SUBSCRIBE
EMAIL DMAXRIDGE@AOL.COM

THIS WAS A MOST INTERESTING WEB PAGE.
I WAS SEARCHING FOR THE REGULATIONS FOR THE HOMESTEAD ACT.
I RECENTLY TURNED 65 AND WANT TO RETIRE.
I'M LOOKING FOR WAYS TO SAVE.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>DOES THE MISSOURI FAMILY NETWORK SEND OUT EMAIL NEWSLETTERS EACH MONTH?<br />
 IF YOU DO, I&#8217;D LIKE TO SUBSCRIBE<br />
EMAIL <a href="mailto:DMAXRIDGE@AOL.COM">DMAXRIDGE@AOL.COM</a></p>
<p>THIS WAS A MOST INTERESTING WEB PAGE.<br />
I WAS SEARCHING FOR THE REGULATIONS FOR THE HOMESTEAD ACT.<br />
I RECENTLY TURNED 65 AND WANT TO RETIRE.<br />
I&#8217;M LOOKING FOR WAYS TO SAVE.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Under the Dome: Dec. 28, 2006 by Theresa Lintzenich</title>
		<link>http://missourifamilynetwork.net/41/under-the-dome-dec-28-2006#comment-636</link>
		<dc:creator>Theresa Lintzenich</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2007 21:10:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://missourifamilynetwork.net/41/under-the-dome-dec-28-2006#comment-636</guid>
		<description>Thank you for your newsletter and website!
This past November, your recommendations of how to vote on the Amendments was a huge help and I passed it on to others.

An idea: Have links to our Missouri congressmen so its easy to email them regarding issues.

Thank you again for your efforts!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for your newsletter and website!<br />
This past November, your recommendations of how to vote on the Amendments was a huge help and I passed it on to others.</p>
<p>An idea: Have links to our Missouri congressmen so its easy to email them regarding issues.</p>
<p>Thank you again for your efforts!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Missouri Judges: Nov 2006 Election Information by DeeDee</title>
		<link>http://missourifamilynetwork.net/36/missouri-judges-nov-2006-election-information#comment-183</link>
		<dc:creator>DeeDee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Nov 2006 21:02:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://missourifamilynetwork.net/36/missouri-judges-nov-2006-election-information#comment-183</guid>
		<description>Thanks for posting this information from an anti-choice viewpoint, I now know which judges are anti-choice, so I can now help to vote them off the bench.  Very helpful!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for posting this information from an anti-choice viewpoint, I now know which judges are anti-choice, so I can now help to vote them off the bench.  Very helpful!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 2006 November Ballot Measures by Will Robinson</title>
		<link>http://missourifamilynetwork.net/33/2006-november-ballot-measures#comment-182</link>
		<dc:creator>Will Robinson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Nov 2006 18:15:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://missourifamilynetwork.net/33/2006-november-ballot-measures#comment-182</guid>
		<description>It's amazing how great the "summary" of Amendment 2 sounds on the ballot itself!  I'm ashamed of the Secretary of State's office, which has the authority for the appearance of the ballot.  An agency with this kind of responsibility must present all issues honestly and fairly on the ballot.  This was not done.

I can't wait for the opporunity to vote Robin Carnahan out of office!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s amazing how great the &#8220;summary&#8221; of Amendment 2 sounds on the ballot itself!  I&#8217;m ashamed of the Secretary of State&#8217;s office, which has the authority for the appearance of the ballot.  An agency with this kind of responsibility must present all issues honestly and fairly on the ballot.  This was not done.</p>
<p>I can&#8217;t wait for the opporunity to vote Robin Carnahan out of office!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Missouri Judges: Nov 2006 Election Information by Kelly</title>
		<link>http://missourifamilynetwork.net/36/missouri-judges-nov-2006-election-information#comment-181</link>
		<dc:creator>Kelly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Nov 2006 18:12:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://missourifamilynetwork.net/36/missouri-judges-nov-2006-election-information#comment-181</guid>
		<description>I went to all the Judges link by their division #  On the ones that are up for re-election and read each ones Biography and found out who appointed them.In my district-Westen Mo there are 11 on the ballot and only one was appointed from a prolife Governor.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I went to all the Judges link by their division #  On the ones that are up for re-election and read each ones Biography and found out who appointed them.In my district-Westen Mo there are 11 on the ballot and only one was appointed from a prolife Governor.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Missouri Judges: Nov 2006 Election Information by Don and Wanda</title>
		<link>http://missourifamilynetwork.net/36/missouri-judges-nov-2006-election-information#comment-180</link>
		<dc:creator>Don and Wanda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Nov 2006 18:01:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://missourifamilynetwork.net/36/missouri-judges-nov-2006-election-information#comment-180</guid>
		<description>Thank you, thank you.  This web site should be in all of our church bulletins.  I always voted by prayer, not knowing which judge should or should not be retained.  Now I feel informed and ready to cast my ballot.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you, thank you.  This web site should be in all of our church bulletins.  I always voted by prayer, not knowing which judge should or should not be retained.  Now I feel informed and ready to cast my ballot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Missouri Judges: Nov 2006 Election Information by Kelly</title>
		<link>http://missourifamilynetwork.net/36/missouri-judges-nov-2006-election-information#comment-179</link>
		<dc:creator>Kelly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Nov 2006 17:03:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://missourifamilynetwork.net/36/missouri-judges-nov-2006-election-information#comment-179</guid>
		<description>This web site has been a great help and i have emailed it to many. I am still looking for info on circut court judges in MO, here is a link I have just found. The names, you have to know who you are voting for.


http://www.16thcircuit.org/Divs/div_list.asp</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This web site has been a great help and i have emailed it to many. I am still looking for info on circut court judges in MO, here is a link I have just found. The names, you have to know who you are voting for.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.16thcircuit.org/Divs/div_list.asp" rel="nofollow">http://www.16thcircuit.org/Divs/div_list.asp</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 2006 November Ballot Measures by Lynda</title>
		<link>http://missourifamilynetwork.net/33/2006-november-ballot-measures#comment-178</link>
		<dc:creator>Lynda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Nov 2006 16:23:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://missourifamilynetwork.net/33/2006-november-ballot-measures#comment-178</guid>
		<description>What God forbad in the system of the Law does not apply here, as He also forbad lending at interest to brothers... please refer to our banking system!  Jesus said plainly that Caesar was Caesar and God was God.  When God runs the government (soon, Lord, please!) things will be different.  But until then, I say tax the tobacco and liquor until it is very difficult for people to justify the cost.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What God forbad in the system of the Law does not apply here, as He also forbad lending at interest to brothers&#8230; please refer to our banking system!  Jesus said plainly that Caesar was Caesar and God was God.  When God runs the government (soon, Lord, please!) things will be different.  But until then, I say tax the tobacco and liquor until it is very difficult for people to justify the cost.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
